Indochina Link Vietnam
EnglishTiếng Việt中文
Vietnam Market Entry

Trademark Registration in Vietnam: IP Viet Nam Process Guide

David Nguyen

Author: David Nguyen

Published Updated Expert Reviewed
Trademark Registration in Vietnam: IP Viet Nam Process Guide
Summarize this article with:
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexityCopilotGrok

Quick Insights (AI Summary)

Vietnam enforces a strict first-to-file trademark doctrine under the Law on Intellectual Property (as amended). Protection belongs to the earliest filing date or Paris Convention priority date, regardless of prior use abroad. For applications published from 1 April 2026, a valid application is published within 1 month, third parties have 3 months from publication to oppose, and IP Viet Nam completes substantive examination within 5 months of publication (Law 131/2025/QH15). Foreign entities without a manufacturing or business establishment in Vietnam must appoint a licensed Vietnamese IP agent, while an FDI company already established in Vietnam may file directly. Registrations run for 10 years and are indefinitely renewable. Administrative fines for infringement and counterfeiting follow the current regulations on penalties in the industrial property field.

Securing brand protection is an early milestone for foreign enterprises planning an FDI company setup. Entering the Vietnamese commercial market without prior trademark clearance exposes brand owners to bad-faith squatting, unauthorized distributor registrations, and enforcement gridlock.

Under the Law on Intellectual Property 50/2005/QH11, as amended by Law 07/2022/QH15 and Law 131/2025/QH15 (effective 1 April 2026), Vietnam strictly enforces a first-to-file legal doctrine. Trademark exclusivity arises solely from official registration, not commercial market presence. Foreign investors, manufacturers, and technology firms must file early through the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (Cục Sở hữu trí tuệ - IP Viet Nam) to establish enforceable legal ownership.

1. The First-to-File Principle and Paris Convention Priority

Vietnam operates strictly under the first-to-file rule codified in Article 90 of the Law on Intellectual Property. Exclusive rights are awarded to the party that first submits a valid registration application satisfying statutory registrability criteria.

Legal Parameter Vietnam Statutory Framework (Law on IP) Practical Impact for Foreign Investors
Basis of Rights Official filing date and registration title Commercial use abroad confers zero rights
Squatting Vulnerability High risk from distributors, competitors, or squatters Preemptive filing required before public launch
International Priority 6-month priority window under Paris Convention Effective filing backdates to home country filing date
Governing Authority IP Viet Nam (Ministry of Science and Technology) Exclusive authority over national examinations

Practical Consequences of First-to-File

Commercial usage across international markets carries no common-law weight in Vietnam. If an opportunistic third party or local distributor files an identical or confusingly similar mark before the legitimate international brand owner, IP Viet Nam grants protection to that earliest applicant.

Once a squatter secures the Certificate of Trademark Registration (Giấy chứng nhận đăng ký nhãn hiệu), the authentic international brand owner is legally classified as an infringer upon importing, manufacturing, or distributing branded goods in Vietnam. Invalidating bad-faith registrations requires complex legal proceedings that delay market entry.

Paris Convention 6-Month Priority Claims

Under the Law on Intellectual Property and the Paris Convention, foreign applicants can secure priority:

  • 6-Month Statutory Window: The Vietnam application must be filed within 06 months from the initial filing date in any Paris Convention member state.
  • Backdating Legal Effect: The effective filing date in Vietnam backdates to the foreign filing date, defeating intervening applications filed by local squatters during that window.
  • Supporting Documentation: The applicant must submit a certified copy of the foreign priority document within 03 months from the Vietnam filing date.

2. Statutory Examination Stages and the 3-Month Opposition Window

Trademark prosecution before IP Viet Nam follows sequential statutory phases, establishing formal and substantive registrability benchmarks.

Examination Phase Statutory Timeline (Law on IP) Practical Duration Key Procedural Milestone
Formality Examination Following the filing date Varies with IP Viet Nam’s workload Verifies applicant details, representation, and Nice classification
Official Publication 01 month from the application being deemed valid Follows formality clearance Published in the Industrial Property Official Gazette
Opposition Window 03 months from publication 03 months Third parties submit formal oppositions
Substantive Examination 05 months from publication Longer if office actions arise Evaluates distinctiveness and prior conflicting registrations
Registration Grant Promptly upon fee settlement Varies with processing Issuance of Certificate of Trademark Registration

Examination Timelines: Law vs. Reality

For applications published from 1 April 2026, the statutory periods are short: publication within 01 month of the application being deemed valid, then substantive examination within 05 months of publication, on top of formality examination. Actual duration depends on office actions and IP Viet Nam’s workload, so brand launches should leave room beyond these periods. Applications filed before 1 April 2026 stay under the former rules, with three exceptions under the new law: formality examination where the application had not yet been accepted as valid, and the opposition and substantive examination periods for applications published from that date.

The 3-Month Third-Party Opposition Window (Article 112a)

The 2022 amendments to the Law on Intellectual Property introduced the opposition mechanism, and the 2025 amendments shortened the opposition period to 03 months for applications published from 1 April 2026:

  • Formal Opposition (Phản đối đơn): Third parties have 03 months from the publication date in the Official Gazette to submit a formal opposition petition against a trademark application.
  • Third-Party Observations (Ý kiến người thứ ba): Any party may submit written opinions regarding the registrability of a mark from publication until before a grant decision is made. Examiners consider these observations during substantive examination.
  • Legal Grounds for Opposition: Typical grounds include bad-faith filing, similarity to earlier trademarks, and conflict with earlier rights.

3. National Route vs. Madrid System Designation for Foreign Applicants

Foreign brand owners have two primary procedural routes to obtain trademark protection in Vietnam: direct national filing with IP Viet Nam or international designation via the Madrid System (WIPO).

Comparison Factor National Route (Direct IP Viet Nam) Madrid System Designation (WIPO)
Application Forum IP Viet Nam WIPO International Bureau (designating Vietnam)
Filing Language Vietnamese English, French, or Spanish
Representation Licensed IP agent mandatory without a Vietnam establishment Handled via WIPO; local agent required only for office actions
Specification Flexibility National specification adjustments possible Strictly tied to basic home country registration
Examination Duration Follows IP Viet Nam’s processing queue IP Viet Nam concludes within 12 months of the International Bureau’s notification
Office Action Response Directly coordinated with local agent Reply within 03 months of IP Viet Nam’s notice, through a local IP agent

Choosing Between the Two Routes

The direct national filing route is optimal when an enterprise lacks an existing home registration, desires customized Vietnamese goods and services descriptions, or requires immediate filing receipts for import customs recordal and local e-commerce authorization (Shopee, Lazada, TikTok Shop). Direct filing also insulates the mark from “central attack” vulnerabilities inherent in the Madrid System during its initial 5-year dependency term.

Conversely, the Madrid Protocol is highly cost-effective for multi-country expansions. If IP Viet Nam issues a Provisional Refusal (Thông báo tạm thời từ chối bảo hộ), the foreign applicant must appoint a licensed Vietnamese IP agent to lodge a formal response within 03 months from the date IP Viet Nam issues the provisional refusal notice.

4. Mandatory Representation and Nice Multi-Class Application Strategy

Foreign applicants must comply with the representation rules and structure specifications under Nice Classification.

Mandatory Industrial Property Representation

Under Article 89 of the Law on Intellectual Property:

  • Foreign individuals without permanent residency in Vietnam and foreign organizations without a manufacturing or commercial establishment in Vietnam must file trademark applications through a licensed Industrial Property Representation Agent (Đại diện sở hữu công nghiệp). A foreign parent company filing from abroad falls in this group.
  • An FDI company already established in Vietnam may file on its own. Many still use an IP representative to handle office actions, deadlines, and Vietnamese-language correspondence.
  • The representation agent must be officially accredited and registered with IP Viet Nam.
  • An executed Power of Attorney (POA) from the applicant is required. Consular authentication or notarization of the POA is generally exempt for standard trademark prosecution, accelerating filing readiness.

Multi-Class Applications under Nice Classification

Goods and services are classified under the Nice Classification that IP Viet Nam publishes in the Industrial Property Gazette, and applicants must classify their lists accordingly (Circular 10/2026/TT-BKHCN). Where the list is unclassified or misclassified, IP Viet Nam reclassifies it and charges a classification fee.

Three practical points apply to the class list:

  • Multi-Class Filings Permitted: Applicants can consolidate multiple classes of goods and services into a single national application.
  • Specification Precision: Broad class headings (such as “all goods in Class 9”) invite examiner objections. Specifications should list specific items conforming to the official Vietnamese translation of the Nice Classification.
  • Fee Structure: Official fees scale with the number of classes and the number of goods or services above the thresholds in the current fee schedule.

5. Protection Term, Renewal Lifecycle, and Post-Registration Monitoring

Securing the Certificate of Trademark Registration is only the initial phase. Systematic docketing protects the asset against expiration and non-use cancellation.

Lifecycle Stage Statutory Milestone (Law on IP) Operational Requirements
Initial Protection Term 10 years from official filing date (Article 93) Certificate remains valid nationwide
Non-Use Cancellation Risk 5 consecutive years of non-use Maintain commercial proof: invoices, contracts, import forms
Standard Renewal Window Within 06 months prior to expiry date Submit renewal request and pay statutory fees
Grace Period Within 06 months after expiry date Subject to a monthly late fee

Protection Term and Renewal Rules

Under the Law on Intellectual Property:

  • 10-Year Protection Term: A trademark registration certificate remains valid for 10 years from the official filing date (rather than the certificate issuance date).
  • Indefinite Renewability: Protection can be renewed indefinitely for successive 10-year terms upon payment of statutory renewal fees.
  • Renewal Deadline: The renewal application must be submitted to IP Viet Nam within 06 months prior to the expiration date.
  • Grace Period: A 6-month grace period is permitted after expiry, subject to a late fee for each month of delay under current fee rules. Failing to renew within this grace window results in the irrevocable abandonment of the mark.

Non-Use Cancellation Vulnerability (Article 95)

Under the Law on Intellectual Property, a registered trademark becomes vulnerable to cancellation if it is not used commercially in Vietnam for five consecutive years without legitimate justification. Foreign brand owners must preserve verifiable usage records, including customs declarations, e-invoices, local distributor agreements, and commercial packaging circulating in Vietnam.

6. Enforcement and Penalties

Vietnam maintains a multi-tiered enforcement framework combining administrative enforcement, border customs measures, and judicial litigation to counter counterfeiting and infringement.

Primary Enforcement Authorities

When infringement or counterfeiting arises, brand owners can mobilize specialized enforcement bodies:

  1. Market Surveillance Forces (Quản lý thị trường): The leading administrative body conducting physical raids, retail inspections, and inventory seizures across warehouses and retail points.
  2. Economic Police (Công an kinh tế): Investigates large-scale commercial counterfeiting networks meeting criminal prosecution thresholds under the Penal Code.
  3. Customs Authorities (Hải quan): Foreign owners can record their registered marks with the General Department of Vietnam Customs to intercept counterfeit imports and exports at border gates.
  4. People’s Courts: Adjudicates civil lawsuits for commercial damages, lost revenues, and legal cost recovery.

Administrative Penalties for Industrial Property Violations

Administrative enforcement represents the most rapid and efficient remedy in Vietnam. Sanctions are set by Decree 99/2013/ND-CP, most recently amended by Decree 186/2026/ND-CP (effective 15 July 2026), which changed remedies and enforcement powers but not the fine brackets. The amounts below are for individuals; organizations pay double:

Infringement Category Statutory Basis Maximum Fine (Individual) Maximum Fine (Organization)
Trademark Infringement (Using confusingly similar signs) Art. 11 VND 250 million (scaled from VND 0.5 million by value of infringing goods) VND 500 million
Manufacturing, Selling, Distributing, or Storing Counterfeits Art. 12 VND 250 million (selling and storing from VND 4 million by value of goods; manufacturing at 1.2 times the trading bracket) VND 500 million
Infringing Domain Names Art. 14 VND 20 million (from VND 5 million) VND 40 million

Authorities additionally enforce mandatory remedial measures: compulsory seizure and destruction of counterfeit goods, removal of infringing signs from commercial facilities, return of infringing domain names or blocking of access to them, and potential suspension of business operating licenses.

Foreign investors should coordinate incorporation with trademark filing. An early registration secures exclusivity and protects brand equity across Vietnam. Companies still being set up can file in parallel with the company formation service.


Indochina Link Vietnam provides specialized intellectual property advisory. Our specialists conduct clearance searches, file national and Madrid applications, handle oppositions, and coordinate enforcement. Contact our intellectual property team to protect your brand in Vietnam.

Frequently asked questions

No. Vietnam follows a strict first-to-file rule, so prior commercial use abroad gives no protection. The exceptions are a Paris Convention priority claim filed within 6 months or proof that the mark is well-known under Article 75.

Only with a manufacturing or business establishment in Vietnam, such as an FDI company already incorporated there. A foreign parent without one, or a non-resident foreign individual, must file through a licensed Vietnamese industrial property representation agent.

For applications published from 1 April 2026, a third party may file a formal opposition within 03 months from publication in the Industrial Property Official Gazette. Applications published earlier keep the former 05-month window.

A registration is valid for 10 years from the filing date and renews indefinitely in 10-year terms. File renewal within 06 months before expiry, or within a 6-month grace period that carries a monthly late fee.

Under Decree 99/2013/ND-CP, fines reach VND 250 million for individuals and VND 500 million for organizations, scaled by the value of the infringing goods, plus confiscation and destruction of counterfeits.

About the Authors

David Nguyen

David Nguyen

Partner, Director, CPA

Expert in M&A Due Diligence, IFRS/VAS Conversion, and FDI Manufacturing Setup. Provides Chief Accountant services for foreign enterprises in Vietnam.

Manufacturing SetupM&A Transaction SupportIFRS/VAS ConversionChief Accountant
Tiffany Nguyen

Tiffany Nguyen

Advisor, Manager, FCCA

Advisor, Accounting Manager with 10+ years of cross-border financial leadership and FCCA qualification. Specialist in multi-entity consolidation, IFRS/VAS compliance, VAT refunds, and FDI financial governance.

Financial Reporting & IFRS/VAS ConversionMulti-Entity Group ConsolidationFDI Tax Compliance & VAT RefundAccounting System Design & Controls

Subscribe to Insights

Get the latest regulatory updates and FDI guides delivered to your inbox. No spam.

More from Vietnam Market Entry

Summarize with AI

ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexityCopilotGrok